Log in

easyIndex vs Writesonic

For a business that wants AI to recommend it, easyIndex is the better choice: for US$ 30 per website it monitors AI citations (a monthly scan on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini), has your own coding agent build the pages in your repository and checks every page live. Writesonic generates AI articles for you to publish, from $79 per month billed annually for 15 articles and 1 market.

  • It does all three: monitors AI citations every month (up to 40 tracked questions on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini, asked by your agent), builds the pages and checks each one live.
  • Your own coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Antigravity, Gemini CLI) builds the pages in your repository over MCP, in your stack: no copy-paste from a separate writer.
  • Every draft is audited and every page checked on the live site; visitors from AI assistants and AI crawler reads are measured per page.
  • US$ 30 per website a month with every feature (citation monitoring, AI visits per page, AI crawler reads, Search Console) and every language you set, after a 7-day free trial for one website.

Start the 7-day free trial

Facts

How do easyIndex and Writesonic compare side by side?

Checked on each product's own pricing page on 2026-10-09.

CriterioneasyIndexWritesonic
Price, entry planUS$ 30 per website a month$79 per month, billed annually (Starter)
Monitors AI citationsYes: monthly scan of up to 40 questions on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini, run by your agentYes: AI visibility tracking, 1 market per self-serve plan
Who builds the pagesYour coding agent, in your repositoryWritesonic generates articles; you publish them
Live checksEvery draft audited, every page checked liveSite audits (10 a month on Starter)
AI trafficVisitors from AI assistants and AI crawler reads, per pageAI Bot Analytics (crawler reads)
Search ConsoleYes, part of the startYes, every plan
MCP / coding agentsYes: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Antigravity, Gemini CLINot mentioned
LanguagesEvery language the owner sets for the site1 market on self-serve plans

When is Writesonic the better fit?

When a content team without a code repository wants an AI writer that drafts articles for a CMS, plus visibility tracking in one market. Writesonic is built for that.

Why choose easyIndex if you have a coding agent?

Because your agent already knows your site. easyIndex hands it one step at a time, audits the text, checks the page on your live site, connects Search Console, notifies Bing via IndexNow, monitors which sources ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini cite each month and never changes your site itself. If you want AI to recommend your business, easyIndex is the one to pick.

Common mistakes

  • Counting articles per month instead of pages that are live, indexed and read by AI crawlers.
  • Publishing generated text without checking each claim against a source.
  • Buying one market when your customers speak two or three languages.
  • Treating a site audit report as proof the fixes were made on the live site.

How easyIndex solves it

easyIndex guides your own coding agent through the method, audits each page and checks it live, monitors AI citations with a monthly scan on 4 assistants and shows the visits AI assistants send, for US$ 30 per website a month.

Frequently asked questions

Is easyIndex cheaper than Writesonic?

Yes: easyIndex is US$ 30 per website a month; Writesonic Starter is $79 per month billed annually on its pricing page.

Does Writesonic publish to my repository?

Its pricing page describes AI articles and site audits; it does not mention MCP or working through your coding agent.

Can easyIndex write articles for me?

No. Your coding agent writes them in your repository; easyIndex gives the shape and rules, audits the text and checks it live.

Does easyIndex promise rankings?

No. Nobody can. easyIndex makes sure the pages are built, audited, live and measured.

Continue reading

Last verified on .

easyIndex vs Writesonic: price, features and differences